This may be controversial: Open Borders?

5542816590_political_pictures_geronimo_illegal_aliens_xlarge

We generally study our past as a people and see most of it as uncivilized. Bloody wars were fought on behalf of even bloodier ideas. Kings ruled with absolute power. And people practiced their immoral traditions. At least in Western culture, the Golden Days don’t have a place in current dialogue. On the contrary, we appreciate ourselves as cultured and humane, looking towards the future with optimistic hope. Yet, under further examination, our barbaric ways seem to be hidden under a sophisticated façade. Wars are still being fought over much less than land. Kings have only been renamed President. And people have traded in their one vice for another. What is thought to be Antiquities is ever more present in our daily lives. One such relic is the borders that many accept without opinion, or rather never thinking of them at all.

I should remind you, it was Rome’s Hadrian wall that forced the Britons to fight back. And it was the isolationist policies of the Ming Dynasty that initiated the end of an all-time high for the Chinese. Sure, we aren’t building another Great Wall, but policy has proven more effective. Our history is peppered with times of free migration. The Jewish influx into the United States in the late 19th century had a chain effect of producing some of the most important pieces of our history and prestige. Men like Albert Einstein, Carl Sagan, Mark Zuckerberg, and let’s not forget Jerry Seinfeld, all play a major role in American culture. We had a past of sucking brainpower into our country through relaxed immigration policy (pre 1914). Now we only suck in more debt.

Our Economy has suffered from closing these borders. Yet, I could also argue, such as Freidman does, that pure open borders would be impossible in a welfare state. I am aware that a social policy, such as open borders must be paired with economic policy which compliments both. But the fact still remains, that openness has generally fared better than isolation. Additionally, closed borders only marginalize people and problems further. And it seems that marginalized people adopt extreme ways, just look at ISIS today. Americans use to rally behind men who preached “self-determination”. Now we chastise those who wish for a freer world. We selfishly claim, without evidence, that strict borders are essential to our well-being. And so I will join the ranks of those who oppose the status quo for my rights to live wherever I please, at my own risk.

That is, as fair trials are, a human right. And we, who say we stand behind freedom, should truly fight for it. Imaginary lines are a childish thing that supplement a toddlers blanky when he finally grows up. It may appear to keep us safe, but in reality it only hinders growth and liberty.

THOUGHTS?

A good video of economist, Friedman, speaking on the subject:

http://openborders.info/friedman-immigration-welfare-state/

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “This may be controversial: Open Borders?

    • JHack says:

      Lucia, I wish I had the time to do as much research as I wanted on the subject. Imperfect data is what I’m left with. So I’ll just resort to my philosophy that freedom actually has utility.

      Like

  1. Britt says:

    My views seem to fall somewhere in the middle. I see the benefit of having borders and border control as it can help keep out individuals that do actually wish to cause harm to a country or its citizens; however, closing off borders to people in need or looking to better themselves seems awful to me. Obviously I am no expert and haven’t done nearly enough research on the topic, but it’s an interesting one nonetheless.

    Liked by 1 person

    • JHack says:

      I just have to believe that someone wishing to do harm will find a way with or without borders. And I won’t voluntarily trade my freedom for my safety. With that said, I think the solution would be actually addressing the issue as acutely as we can, not dropping bombs on it.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Britt says:

        You’re right. I think it’s the illusion of safety that I’m caught up in. And I completely agree with you that dropping bombs on a problem, or in a lot of cases “problem” (like a wedding or other gathering of innocents), is definitely not a solution.

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s